MARKETING AUTOMATION

11x Review 2026

11x markets itself as the AI SDR that replaces human reps entirely. Backed by a16z and Benchmark with a reported $50M+ raise, the company has drawn significant attention in the AI sales space. But beneath the funding headlines, a pattern of problems has emerged: TechCrunch reporting exposed fabricated customer claims, community data points to roughly 75% churn within three months, and the minimum annual commitment sits north of $60,000. RevOps leaders evaluating 11x need to separate the venture capital narrative from the operational reality.

⚡

The Verdict: 11x is a high-risk, high-cost bet on fully autonomous outbound. The technology shows occasional flashes of competence, but the company's credibility issues (documented fake customer logos, inflated metrics) and punishing contract terms make it a difficult recommendation for any RevOps leader who answers to a CFO. The 75% three-month churn rate reported across multiple sources is not a growing-pain statistic; it signals a product that consistently fails to deliver on its promises. There are lower-risk ways to test AI SDR capabilities without locking into a $60K annual commitment with a vendor whose own customers have publicly disputed being customers at all.

Company Overview

What Is 11x, from a RevOps Seat?

11x offers an AI SDR agent (branded 'Alice') designed to fully automate outbound prospecting. The pitch is straightforward: replace your human SDR team with an AI that researches prospects, writes personalized emails, and handles follow-ups at scale. The product pulls from a proprietary contact database to build target lists, then generates and sends outbound sequences without human intervention.

In theory, this is the logical endpoint of sales automation: remove the human bottleneck entirely. In practice, the execution has been rocky. Multiple RevOps practitioners have reported that the AI's email quality degrades quickly, personalization often feels superficial or inaccurate, and the system lacks the contextual judgment that even a mediocre human SDR brings to prospect research. When the AI gets something wrong, there is no human in the loop to catch it before a poorly researched email hits a VP's inbox.

The bigger concern for RevOps leaders is the company's track record with transparency. TechCrunch's reporting revealed that 11x listed companies as customers that had never used the product. That kind of credibility gap matters when you are evaluating whether to hand your outbound pipeline to a vendor. If a company exaggerates its own customer base, what confidence do you have in the performance metrics they share during the sales process?

⚠

Due Diligence Warning

TechCrunch documented instances of 11x claiming companies as customers that denied ever using the product. Combined with reported 75% three-month churn, RevOps leaders should demand verifiable references and insist on a pilot period before signing any annual commitment. Ask for customers in your segment who have been live for 6+ months.

Pricing

What 11x Actually Costs

11x does not publish transparent pricing. Based on community reports and sales conversations, expect a significant annual commitment with limited flexibility. The company's pricing model reflects its VC-backed growth strategy: lock customers into annual contracts and optimize for headline ARR.

Plan	Price	What’s Included
AI SDR (Alice)	~$5,000/mo	AI-generated outbound sequences, prospect research, email personalization, follow-up automation
Annual Commitment	$60,000+/yr	12-month contract required, volume-based pricing tiers, onboarding and setup support Required

Keep In Mind

Annual contracts are mandatory. There is no monthly or quarterly billing option. You are committing $60K+ before seeing meaningful results.
Pricing is not published on the website. Expect the sales process to involve multiple calls before you get a number, which is a red flag for budget planning.
Early termination terms are unclear. Multiple users report difficulty exiting contracts even when results fail to materialize.
ROI claims made during the sales process should be pressure-tested against the reported 75% three-month churn rate. If three-quarters of customers leave within 90 days, the average customer is not seeing the ROI that was promised.

Core Features

What 11x Does Well

🤖

AI SDR Agent (Alice)

Autonomous outbound agent that researches prospects and generates personalized email sequences. Quality is inconsistent, and the personalization often misses context that a human would catch.

📧

Automated Email Sequences

Multi-step outbound sequences generated and sent without human input. Volume is high, but deliverability and reply quality vary significantly based on user reports.

🔍

Prospect Research

AI-driven research on target accounts and contacts. Pulls from proprietary data. The depth of research is shallow compared to what a trained SDR produces with tools like LinkedIn and 10-K filings.

📊

Performance Dashboard

Reporting on sends, opens, replies, and meetings booked. Useful for tracking volume, but users report the attribution can be opaque and difficult to reconcile with CRM data.

💰

CRM Integration

Connects to Salesforce and HubSpot. Activity logging and lead sync are functional but require careful mapping to avoid duplicate records and attribution conflicts.

🎯

ICP Targeting

Define your ideal customer profile and the AI builds prospect lists. The targeting works at a firmographic level but lacks the nuance of intent signals or technographic layering.

Limitations

Where 11x Falls Short

No tool is perfect. Here are the real trade-offs you should know about:

Documented Credibility Issues

TechCrunch reporting exposed that 11x listed companies as customers on their website that denied ever using the product. This is not a minor marketing oversight. When a vendor fabricates social proof, it undermines every claim they make about product performance, customer satisfaction, and ROI. RevOps leaders should weight this heavily in their evaluation.

"We were listed as a customer on their website. We never signed a contract with 11x and never used their product. We asked them to remove our logo."

Unnamed company cited in TechCrunch reporting

Severe Churn Problem

Community data and multiple independent reports point to approximately 75% of customers churning within the first three months. This is an extraordinarily high failure rate that suggests the product consistently under-delivers relative to sales expectations. A tool that loses three out of four customers in a quarter is not experiencing normal growing pains; it is failing its core value proposition.

"We gave it three months. The emails were generic, the meetings it booked were unqualified, and when we tried to exit, the contract made it painful. Total waste of budget."

RevOps Manager, Series B SaaS (anonymized)

Email Quality Degrades at Scale

The AI personalization that looks impressive in demos often falls apart in production. Emails reference incorrect company details, misattribute roles, or use generic filler that recipients immediately recognize as AI-generated. In outbound, your sender reputation is everything. Sending hundreds of low-quality emails does not just fail to generate pipeline; it actively damages your domain and brand.

No Human-in-the-Loop Safety Net

Unlike hybrid approaches, 11x's fully autonomous model means there is no human reviewing emails before they send. For high-value enterprise outbound, this is a significant risk. One poorly researched email to a C-suite prospect at a target account can close a door permanently. RevOps teams accustomed to quality controls will find this uncomfortable.

Evaluation

Pros and Cons Summary

+ The Good Stuff

High-volume outbound without adding SDR headcount, if the quality bar is acceptable for your market.
a16z and Benchmark backing provides some runway confidence that the company will not disappear overnight.
Autonomous operation requires minimal day-to-day management once configured.
CRM integrations work at a basic level for activity logging.
The concept of AI SDR is directionally correct, even if this execution has problems.
Prospect research automation saves time on the top-of-funnel list-building step.

- The Problems

TechCrunch-documented fake customer claims raise serious trust and credibility concerns.
Approximately 75% three-month churn rate suggests most customers do not see promised results.
$60,000+ annual commitment with no monthly or quarterly escape hatch.
Email quality is inconsistent and often recognizably AI-generated by recipients.
No human-in-the-loop review means errors reach prospects without any quality gate.
Opaque pricing and aggressive sales process make informed budget planning difficult.

Decision Framework

Should You Buy 11x?

BUY 11X IF

✅

You have budget to absorb the risk and need to test fully autonomous outbound

Only consider 11x if you treat the $60K as an R&D experiment, not a guaranteed pipeline investment. The risk profile demands conservative expectations.

You have $60K+ in discretionary budget that you can write off if the experiment fails.
Your outbound motion targets high-volume, lower-ACV segments where individual email quality matters less.
You have verified the product with at least three references in your industry who have used it for 6+ months.
Your domain reputation can absorb a period of higher-volume outbound while you tune the system.
You have leadership buy-in that this is an experiment, not a sure thing.

SKIP 11X IF

❌

The risk-reward ratio does not justify the commitment

For most RevOps teams, the combination of credibility concerns, high churn, and rigid contracts makes 11x a poor allocation of limited budget.

You cannot afford to lose $60K on a tool that statistically fails for 75% of customers within three months.
Your outbound targets enterprise buyers who will notice and penalize low-quality AI-generated emails.
You need verifiable, transparent customer references and cannot get them.
Your team values human oversight in outbound communications to protect brand reputation.
You prefer quarterly or monthly billing to limit financial exposure during evaluation.

Alternatives

11x Alternatives Worth Considering

Tool	Starting Price	Strength	Best For
AiSDR	$900/mo quarterly	Transparent pricing, cancel anytime	Teams wanting low-risk AI SDR entry
Artisan	~$1,500-2,000/mo	300M+ contacts, Y Combinator backed	Mid-market teams wanting AI BDR capabilities
Regie.ai	From $35K/yr	AI + human hybrid, parallel dialer	Teams wanting human oversight with AI scale

🔍 Questions to Ask Before Signing

Can we verify the customer references independently? Given TechCrunch's reporting on fabricated customer claims, insist on speaking directly with customers. Ask for references in your vertical who have been live for at least six months. If they cannot provide this, that tells you something.
What is the actual churn rate for customers in our segment? Ask directly what percentage of customers renew after the first year. If they dodge the question or only share hand-picked success stories, factor the reported 75% three-month churn into your risk model.
What are the contract exit terms if results do not materialize? Before signing, get written clarity on early termination. Can you exit at six months if pipeline targets are not met? What penalties apply? This is critical given the churn data.
How does the AI handle sensitive or high-value accounts? If you have named accounts where a bad outbound email could damage the relationship permanently, understand whether you can exclude them or add human review. Fully autonomous systems are risky for enterprise targets.
What deliverability protections are built in? High-volume AI outbound can crater your domain reputation if not managed carefully. Ask about sending limits, warm-up protocols, bounce handling, and what happens if your domain gets flagged.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

How do RevOps teams use 11x?

RevOps teams deploy 11x's AI agent Alice to automate outbound prospecting end-to-end: ICP definition, prospect list building from a proprietary database, personalized email generation, and multi-step follow-up sequences. The fully autonomous model means no human reviews emails before they send. In practice, most RevOps teams that stick with 11x use it for high-volume, lower-ACV outbound where individual email quality matters less and scale matters more.

Is 11x worth it for RevOps?

For most RevOps teams, no. The reported 75% three-month churn rate means three out of four customers do not see sufficient ROI to continue. The $60K+ annual commitment with no monthly or quarterly billing option compounds the risk. TechCrunch-documented fake customer claims further erode trust. The only scenario where 11x pencils out is if you treat the $60K as disposable R&D budget, target high-volume segments, and verify references independently before signing.

How much does 11x cost?

11x costs approximately $5,000 per month with a mandatory annual contract, putting the minimum commitment at $60,000+ per year. Pricing is not published on their website and requires multiple sales calls to obtain. There is no monthly or quarterly billing option. Early termination terms are unclear, and multiple users report difficulty exiting contracts. Volume-based pricing tiers exist but specifics are negotiated individually.

What are 11x's limitations?

The biggest limitations are credibility and quality. TechCrunch documented 11x listing companies as customers that denied ever using the product. Email personalization degrades at scale, often producing messages recipients immediately recognize as AI-generated. The fully autonomous model has no human-in-the-loop safety net, so errors reach prospects unchecked. The annual contract offers no escape if results disappoint, and roughly 75% of customers churn within three months.

11x vs AiSDR: which is better?

AiSDR is the lower-risk choice by every measurable dimension. AiSDR costs $900/month with quarterly billing and cancel-anytime terms versus 11x's $60K+ annual lock-in. AiSDR's 700M+ contact database is larger than 11x's proprietary data. Both produce comparable AI-generated emails that require periodic oversight. The only argument for 11x is if you need fully autonomous, high-volume outbound and have budget to absorb a likely failure. For everyone else, start with AiSDR.

The RevOps Report’s Bottom Line

11x represents the most aggressive bet in the AI SDR space: fully autonomous outbound backed by top-tier venture capital. But the documented credibility problems, extreme churn rates, and rigid contract terms make it one of the highest-risk tools a RevOps leader can buy. The technology may eventually deliver on its promise, but the current evidence suggests most customers are paying $60K+ to learn that lesson the hard way.

But know the trade-offs:

Highest funding and ambition in the category, but also the highest documented failure rate and the most serious credibility concerns.
Fully autonomous means zero management overhead, but also zero quality control before emails reach real prospects.
Annual contract locks in budget predictability for the vendor, but removes your ability to exit when (not if) problems emerge in the first 90 days.

About the Author

Rome Thorndike is VP of Revenue at Firmograph.ai, where he builds AI agents that analyze GTM data for revenue leaders. His career spans enterprise sales at Salesforce and Microsoft, helping scale Sequoia-backed Snapdocs from Series A through Series D, and leading sales at Datajoy through its acquisition by Databricks. Rome holds an MBA from UC Berkeley Haas with a focus on statistical analysis and machine learning.

Connect on LinkedIn · About The RevOps Report