COMPARISON

11x vs Artisan: AI SDR Comparison for RevOps Teams

AI SDRs promise to automate top-of-funnel prospecting. For RevOps, the question is not whether the AI can send emails. The question is whether it will wreck your CRM data, create duplicate records, ignore your routing rules, and generate pipeline you cannot trust. Here is how 11x and Artisan stack up on the things that actually matter to ops teams.

Quick Verdict: 11x runs fully autonomous with minimal configuration but gives you less control over outbound logic. Artisan (Ava) offers more customization and a visual workflow builder, but demands more setup time. Neither has mature CRM-native integrations yet. Budget $35K-$100K+ annually for either. If CRM hygiene is non-negotiable, plan for significant monitoring overhead with both.

Quick Comparison

11x vs Artisan at a Glance

Factor	11x	Artisan
Pricing	From ~$5K/mo (annual contract)	From ~$2K/mo (annual contract)
Best For	Hands-off autonomous outbound	Customizable AI SDR workflows
Category	AI SDR Platform	AI SDR Platform
CRM Integration	Salesforce, HubSpot via API Monitoring needed	Salesforce, HubSpot native Still maturing
Data Source	Built-in prospecting data	Built-in B2B database (300M+ contacts claimed)
Personalization	AI-generated, limited manual override	Template-based with AI variation
Setup Time	1-2 weeks Faster	2-4 weeks More config
Contract Terms	Annual commitment typical	Annual commitment typical

Feature Breakdown

Detailed Feature Comparison

Feature	11x	Artisan
Autonomous Prospecting	Full autopilot mode Core strength	Semi-autonomous with guardrails
Email Sequences	AI-generated multi-step	Visual builder with AI content More control
Lead Scoring	Basic intent signals	Waterfall enrichment approach
Multi-Channel	Email primary, LinkedIn limited	Email + LinkedIn + phone Broader
Reporting	Dashboard with send/reply metrics	More granular campaign analytics Better
Duplicate Management	Basic dedup Gaps reported	Account matching logic Improving
Compliance (GDPR)	Opt-out handling included	Built-in compliance workflows

Decision Framework

When to Use Which

Choose 11x When

You want maximum automation with minimal ops involvement in day-to-day execution
Your team is small and cannot dedicate time to configuring outbound workflows manually
Speed to launch matters more than granular control over messaging cadences
You are comfortable trading customization for hands-off operation
Your ICP is broad enough that AI targeting will produce acceptable results

Choose Artisan When

You need detailed control over prospecting logic, messaging templates, and send schedules
Your outbound motion is multi-channel (email + LinkedIn + phone) and you need unified tracking
RevOps wants to define targeting rules, exclusion lists, and approval workflows before anything sends
You value a visual workflow builder for designing and iterating on sequences
Your compliance requirements demand granular control over who gets contacted and when

When to Consider Both or Neither

Running both is wasteful since they solve the same problem. If neither meets your control requirements, consider a traditional SEP (Outreach, Salesloft) with human SDRs and use Clay for enrichment. The "AI SDR" category is still young, and the integration maturity is not where most RevOps teams need it to be.

RevOps Perspective

What This Means for Your Stack

RevOps-Specific Considerations

CRM data quality is the biggest risk with both platforms. Autonomous email generation means autonomous record creation. Without strict dedup rules and field-mapping governance, expect data drift within weeks.
Neither platform handles complex lead routing natively. If you run territory-based assignment, round-robin, or account-based routing through LeanData or similar, you will need middleware or manual rules to prevent conflicts.
Attribution gets murky fast. Both tools create their own activity records, but mapping those to your existing campaign/source taxonomy in Salesforce or HubSpot requires custom configuration.
Total cost of ownership extends beyond license fees. Plan for 10-15 hours per month of ops monitoring, data cleanup, and rule maintenance for either platform.
Deliverability is your problem. Both send from your domain. If the AI sends low-quality messages at high volume, your domain reputation takes the hit. Warm-up and volume governance fall on your team.

Summary

Winner by Use Case

Use Case	Winner	Why
Fastest deployment	11x	Less configuration needed, autonomous by design
Ops control and governance	Artisan	More configurable workflows and approval layers
Multi-channel outbound	Artisan	Better LinkedIn and phone integration
Lean team, no dedicated ops	11x	Set-and-monitor approach requires less daily management
CRM hygiene priority	Neither	Both require significant monitoring; plan for cleanup overhead
Budget under $3K/mo	Artisan	Lower entry pricing on base plans

The RevOps Report's Bottom Line

Both 11x and Artisan are bets on AI-automated top-of-funnel. For RevOps, the calculus is straightforward: 11x gives you speed and autonomy at the cost of control; Artisan gives you control at the cost of setup time. Neither is a drop-in replacement for a human SDR team managed through a proper SEP. If your CRM data is already messy, adding an autonomous outbound agent will accelerate the mess. Clean your data first, define your routing and attribution rules, then evaluate whether AI SDRs fit your process or break it.

Get Weekly RevOps Intelligence

Tool reviews, salary benchmarks, and stack recommendations for RevOps leaders.

Subscribe Free

Disclosure: The RevOps Report may receive affiliate compensation from tools mentioned here. Our analysis is independent. Every claim is based on publicly available data and user feedback.

Last Updated: January 2026