
HubSpot sells the dream of one platform for marketing, sales, and service. For RevOps teams at SMB and mid-market companies, that unified data model solves a real problem: no more syncing contacts between systems, no more attribution black holes between marketing and sales. Operations Hub adds the workflow and data tools RevOps specifically needs.
HubSpot is an all-in-one CRM platform covering marketing, sales, service, and operations. For RevOps, the key differentiator is the unified data model. When marketing and sales run on the same platform, the contact-level attribution and handoff tracking that RevOps needs comes natively. No middleware. No sync delays. No record conflicts.
Operations Hub launched in 2021 specifically for RevOps use cases: data sync across tools, data quality automation, programmable workflows with custom code actions, and calculated properties. It's HubSpot's acknowledgment that RevOps is a distinct buyer with distinct needs, not just a subset of sales ops.
The platform is easier to administer than Salesforce by a wide margin. That's a genuine advantage for teams that don't have (or can't afford) a dedicated CRM admin. But easier doesn't mean simple. Complex HubSpot orgs still need thoughtful architecture, and the limitations around object customization and reporting depth surface as you scale.
HubSpot's integration ecosystem has matured significantly. The App Marketplace now has 1,600+ integrations, and the native data sync (Operations Hub) connects tools bi-directionally without middleware. For RevOps teams running Outreach or Salesloft alongside HubSpot, the integration works but lacks the field-mapping depth you get with Salesforce connectors. The sweet spot is teams running mostly HubSpot-native tools across marketing, sales, and service where the unified platform eliminates sync entirely.
HubSpot's 2025-2026 moves include AI-powered content generation, predictive deal scoring, and the Breeze Copilot assistant. The AI features are bundled into existing tiers rather than sold as expensive add-ons (unlike Salesforce Einstein). Custom objects got more flexible in recent updates, closing some of the gap with Salesforce. The platform is clearly targeting upmarket, but the contact-based pricing model still punishes companies with large databases, especially marketing-heavy orgs running nurture campaigns at scale.
If you're evaluating HubSpot for RevOps, Operations Hub Professional or Enterprise is where the value is. The free and Starter tiers lack the data quality automation, custom code actions, and advanced workflow triggers that ops teams need.
HubSpot's pricing model combines per-seat fees with contact tier limits. The free tier is functional enough to start, but scaling from Starter to Professional to Enterprise comes with significant jumps. Contact overages add up if you're not pruning your database.
| Plan | Price | What’s Included |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tools | $0 | Basic CRM, forms, email, limited reporting. 1M contacts. Start Here |
| Sales Hub Starter | $20/user/mo | Simple automation, goals, meeting scheduling, 1:1 email |
| Sales Hub Professional | $100/user/mo | Sequences, forecasting, custom reporting, playbooks Most Popular |
| Sales Hub Enterprise | $150/user/mo | Custom objects, predictive lead scoring, advanced permissions |
| Operations Hub Pro | $800/mo | Data quality automation, programmable automation, webhooks RevOps |
| Operations Hub Enterprise | $2,000/mo | Advanced data curation, datasets, sandboxes |
Custom code actions, data quality automation, and programmable workflows. This is the RevOps-specific tooling that justifies HubSpot over simpler CRMs.
Marketing, sales, and service share the same contact and company records. Attribution, lifecycle tracking, and handoff reporting work without middleware.
Cross-object reporting with a visual builder. Less powerful than Salesforce for complex queries, but adequate for most mid-market reporting needs.
Two-way sync with 100+ apps. Field mappings, sync rules, and conflict resolution. Replaces middleware tools for basic integration needs.
Workflow automation for lifecycle management, lead routing, deal stage transitions, and task creation. The UI is clean and accessible to non-technical ops.
Custom formulas on properties without code. Useful for derived metrics like days-in-stage, lead score components, and deal velocity calculations.
No tool is perfect. Here are the real trade-offs you should know about:
HubSpot's free tier is generous, and the Starter plans are affordable. But the Professional-to-Enterprise jump is where it gets expensive, especially with contact tier pricing layered on top. RevOps teams at growing companies frequently report sticker shock when they hit the next tier.
Custom objects are Enterprise-only and less flexible than Salesforce's data model. If your RevOps processes require complex relational data structures (multi-entity quoting, hierarchical territories, custom junction objects), you'll feel the constraints. HubSpot is investing here, but it's still behind Salesforce for deep data architecture.
HubSpot's reporting improved significantly, but it doesn't match Salesforce or a dedicated BI tool for complex analysis. Multi-object reporting, custom SQL queries, and advanced cohort analysis will push you toward exporting data. For day-to-day operational dashboards, it's fine. For board-level analysis, plan on supplementing.
Moving to HubSpot from Salesforce (or vice versa) is a 3-6 month project for a mid-market org. Custom fields, automation logic, integrations, and historical data all need migration plans. The HubSpot sales team will tell you it's easy. It's not easy. Budget time and resources accordingly.
RevOps teams at SMB and mid-market companies that need marketing-sales alignment without a dedicated Salesforce admin will get the most value here.
Larger RevOps teams with complex data models, deep automation requirements, and heavy reporting needs will hit HubSpot's ceiling.
| Tool | Starting Price | Strength | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | $25-300/user/mo | Unmatched customization depth | Enterprise with dedicated admins |
| Pipedrive | $14-99/user/mo | Simple, sales-focused CRM | Small teams wanting minimal setup |
| Freshsales | $9-69/user/mo | Built-in phone and email | Budget-conscious SMBs |
RevOps teams use HubSpot for unified lifecycle management across marketing and sales. Key workflows include lead scoring and routing via workflows, pipeline management with custom deal stages, marketing-to-sales handoff tracking without middleware, and Operations Hub for data quality automation and cross-tool sync. The single contact record shared across Hubs means attribution reporting works natively. Most mid-market RevOps teams run HubSpot as both CRM and marketing platform, eliminating the Salesforce-Marketo sync headaches.
Operations Hub. It's HubSpot's direct answer to RevOps needs: programmable automation with custom code actions, data quality tools that fix formatting and deduplicate records automatically, and bi-directional data sync with 100+ apps. No other CRM has a dedicated hub built specifically for ops. The unified data model also eliminates the biggest RevOps pain point — syncing contact data between marketing and sales systems. One record, one timeline, no conflicts.
Free CRM is real and functional. Sales Hub: $20/user/month (Starter), $100/user/month (Professional), $150/user/month (Enterprise). Operations Hub: $800/month (Professional) or $2,000/month (Enterprise). The trap is contact-based pricing. A 50-user org on Sales Hub Professional + Ops Hub Professional with 100K contacts typically lands at $8-12K/month all-in. Contact overages trigger automatically. The jump from Pro to Enterprise is steep but necessary if you need custom objects. Annual contracts required.
Four recurring frustrations: custom objects are Enterprise-only and less flexible than Salesforce's data model (you'll feel this above 200 users), reporting hits a ceiling for complex cross-object analysis (most teams supplement with Looker or similar), contact-based pricing punishes growth (your marketing team's database size directly increases CRM cost), and workflow complexity gets unwieldy at scale. HubSpot workflows lack the branching sophistication of Salesforce Flows for intricate approval and routing logic.
HubSpot wins on: unified marketing-sales data (no sync), lower admin burden (no dedicated SFDC admin needed), faster deployment, and Operations Hub's RevOps-specific tooling. Salesforce wins on: data model depth, enterprise permissions, AppExchange ecosystem, and reporting flexibility. The break point is around 150-200 sales users. Below that, HubSpot's simplicity and unified platform save ops hours. Above that, Salesforce's customization handles the complexity better. Migration between them is 3-6 months regardless of direction.
HubSpot is the CRM that RevOps teams at SMB and mid-market companies should evaluate first. The unified data model, Operations Hub tooling, and lower admin burden solve real problems for teams that don't have Salesforce-level resources. The platform has grown significantly in enterprise capability, but it's still playing catch-up on deep customization, advanced reporting, and complex permission models. Budget carefully, because the pricing curve gets steep as you scale.
But know the trade-offs:
The RevOps Report delivers honest assessments of GTM tools from a practitioner perspective.
Subscribe to The RevOps Report Browse All Tool Reviews