COMPARISON
Outreach
VS
Salesloft

Outreach vs Salesloft: Sales Engagement Compared for RevOps

After a decade of head-to-head competition, Outreach and Salesloft have converged on core features. Both handle sequences, calling, email tracking, and analytics. The real differences for RevOps teams are integration depth, admin overhead, CRM sync reliability, and how the Clari acquisition of Salesloft in 2025 changes the product roadmap. Feature checklists are nearly identical. The ops experience is not.

!
Quick Verdict: Outreach is built for enterprise complexity with deeper automation and more configuration options, but demands more ops time to manage. Salesloft is faster to deploy and easier for reps to adopt, but less flexible for complex workflows. The Clari acquisition adds forecasting upside to Salesloft but introduces integration uncertainty. For RevOps teams with dedicated ops headcount, Outreach offers more control. For teams that value time-to-value, Salesloft is the safer bet.

Outreach vs Salesloft at a Glance

FactorOutreachSalesloft
Pricing$100-160/user/mo Annual only$75-175/user/mo Annual typical
Best ForEnterprise teams, complex workflowsMid-market teams, faster onboarding
G2 Rating4.3/5 (3,300+ reviews)4.5/5 (3,900+ reviews) Higher
Ease of Setup (G2)7.6/10 Steeper8.6/10 Faster
CRM SyncDeep SF sync, complex field mapping GranularSmoother SF sync, less config needed
OwnershipIndependent (VC-backed)Clari (acquired Aug 2025) M&A risk
Implementation6-12 weeks typical2-4 weeks typical Faster
Admin OverheadHigh; needs dedicated ops Time-intensiveModerate; manageable by part-time ops

Detailed Feature Comparison

FeatureOutreachSalesloft
Sequence BuilderAdvanced branching and conditional logic More powerfulClean, intuitive with fewer options
Email Automation9.1/10 G2 score9.2/10 G2 score
Call Recording8.3/10 G2 score9.0/10 G2 score Better
Multi-Org SupportAvailable Enterprise featureLimited
Territory ManagementBuilt-in StrongBasic territory support
AI AssistanceKaia AI for real-time call coachingRhythm AI for workflow prioritization
ForecastingBasic deal inspectionClari-powered forecasting Stronger post-acquisition

When to Use Which

Choose Outreach When

  • You have dedicated RevOps headcount to configure and maintain complex sequence logic
  • Your sales motion involves multi-step, conditional workflows that branch based on prospect behavior
  • Enterprise features like multi-org support and advanced territory management are requirements
  • Your CRM field mapping needs are complex and you want granular control over what syncs and when
  • You can afford a 6-12 week implementation and the ongoing admin overhead that comes with it

Choose Salesloft When

  • Time-to-value is critical and you need reps productive in weeks, not months
  • Your ops team is lean (1-2 people) and cannot dedicate major ongoing hours to SEP administration
  • Rep adoption matters more than configuration flexibility; your team values clean UX
  • The Clari acquisition is a positive signal (you want forecasting integration in your engagement tool)
  • Call recording and coaching features are a priority for your sales managers

When to Consider Both or Neither

Running both is a waste. If neither feels right, Apollo.io at $49/user/mo covers 80% of what mid-market teams need from a SEP at a fraction of the cost. For enterprise teams that find both Outreach and Salesloft inadequate, the real issue is usually CRM configuration, not SEP selection.

What This Means for Your Stack

RevOps-Specific Considerations

  • CRM sync reliability is the top complaint with both tools. Outreach gives you more control over sync rules but more complexity to manage. Salesloft syncs are smoother by default but harder to customize. Test your specific field-mapping requirements during evaluation.
  • The Clari-Salesloft merger means Salesloft product roadmap is now tied to Clari strategy. If you invest in Salesloft, you are indirectly betting on Clari execution. Ask about contractual product commitments before signing multi-year deals.
  • Admin overhead with Outreach is consistently 2-3x higher than Salesloft based on G2 user feedback. For a 100-person sales org, budget 15-20 hours/week of ops time for Outreach versus 5-10 for Salesloft.
  • Reporting and analytics differ in philosophy. Outreach provides more raw data and lets you build reports. Salesloft provides more opinionated, pre-built dashboards. Choose based on whether your team wants flexibility or guidance.
  • Contract negotiation matters significantly. Both tools discount 30-50% off list price at scale. Use Vendr or Spendflo benchmarking data to anchor your negotiations. Never pay list price.

Winner by Use Case

Use CaseWinnerWhy
Enterprise complexityOutreachMulti-org, territories, advanced branching logic
Fastest deploymentSalesloft2-4 weeks vs 6-12 weeks
Rep adoptionSalesloftBetter UX, higher G2 satisfaction scores
CRM sync controlOutreachMore granular field mapping and sync rules
Revenue forecastingSalesloftClari integration adds forecasting capability
Lean ops teamSalesloftLower ongoing admin burden

The RevOps Report's Bottom Line

Feature parity between Outreach and Salesloft is real. The decision is about operational fit. Outreach is the enterprise power tool that rewards ops investment with flexibility. Salesloft is the mid-market workhorse that prioritizes adoption and time-to-value. The Clari acquisition makes Salesloft more interesting for teams that want engagement + forecasting in one stack, but adds merger risk. Run a two-week pilot with both if your deal size justifies the evaluation time. For most mid-market teams, Salesloft is the faster path to results. For enterprise teams with dedicated ops, Outreach is worth the overhead.

Get Weekly RevOps Intelligence

Tool reviews, salary benchmarks, and stack recommendations for RevOps leaders.

Subscribe Free
Disclosure: The RevOps Report may receive affiliate compensation from tools mentioned here. Our analysis is independent. Every claim is based on publicly available data and user feedback.
Last Updated: January 2026