Pardot is Salesforce's marketing automation platform, now officially rebranded as Marketing Cloud Account Engagement. Nobody calls it that. Everyone still calls it Pardot. The naming confusion is a decent metaphor for the product itself: powerful Salesforce-native capabilities wrapped in a package that could use a clearer identity and a fresher coat of paint. For RevOps teams on Salesforce, Pardot's killer advantage is zero sync friction. There's no middleware, no connector to maintain, no duplicate record reconciliation between your marketing automation and your CRM. The data lives in Salesforce and Pardot reads it natively. That alone makes it the default choice for thousands of Salesforce shops. The trade-off is a UI that feels like it was designed by committee in 2016 and a reporting engine that makes you reach for a BI tool.
Pardot is Salesforce's B2B marketing automation platform. It handles lead scoring, email nurturing, landing pages, forms, and campaign reporting, all within the Salesforce ecosystem. For RevOps, the defining characteristic is the native Salesforce integration. Pardot doesn't sync with Salesforce through an API connector. It reads and writes to Salesforce objects directly. Lead scores, engagement history, campaign membership, and prospect data all live in the same platform your sales team uses daily. No sync lag, no duplicate records from integration failures, no middleware to troubleshoot.
Engagement Studio is Pardot's visual automation builder and the primary tool for nurturing workflows. It supports branching logic, wait steps, triggers based on prospect behavior, and actions that update Salesforce records. It's capable and reliable, though not as flexible as Marketo's Smart Campaigns for edge-case automation. For the vast majority of B2B nurturing use cases (drip sequences, re-engagement, event follow-up, scoring-triggered emails), Engagement Studio handles the job.
The honest assessment: Pardot is the Toyota Camry of marketing automation. It's reliable, widely supported, and does what most teams need without drama. It's not exciting, the dashboard won't win design awards, and you'll wish the reporting was better. But the Salesforce-native architecture eliminates an entire category of problems that Marketo and HubSpot users spend hours managing. For RevOps teams who've lost weekends to Marketo-Salesforce sync failures, that reliability has real value.
Salesforce rebranded Pardot as 'Marketing Cloud Account Engagement' in 2022. The product is functionally the same. Your team, your consultants, and most documentation still call it Pardot. Don't let the naming confusion factor into your evaluation. Judge it on capabilities, not branding.
Pardot pricing is published and tiered by feature set. All tiers include the native Salesforce integration. Pricing is based on a platform fee, not per-contact, which becomes a cost advantage at scale compared to Marketo's database-based pricing.
| Plan | Price | What’s Included |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | $1,250/mo | Email marketing, lead scoring, Engagement Studio, forms, landing pages, 10K contacts Entry Tier |
| Plus | $2,750/mo | Growth features plus advanced analytics, A/B testing, Google Ads integration, dynamic content, 10K contacts Most Common |
| Advanced | $4,400/mo | Plus features plus AI-powered scoring (Einstein), custom user roles, API access, 10K contacts |
| Premium | $15,000/mo | Advanced features plus up to 75K contacts, dedicated IP, advanced analytics, premium support Enterprise |
Built into the Salesforce platform. No connector, no sync engine, no middleware. Lead records, scores, engagement data, and campaign membership exist as native Salesforce objects. This is Pardot's single biggest advantage over every competitor.
Dual scoring system: Score (behavioral engagement) and Grade (firmographic fit). Both flow directly into Salesforce for routing and prioritization. Simpler than Marketo's multi-model approach but covers the majority of B2B scoring needs.
Visual workflow builder for nurture campaigns with branching logic, wait steps, behavioral triggers, and Salesforce actions. Drag-and-drop interface for multi-step automation. Reliable and capable for standard B2B nurturing scenarios.
Template-based email builder with personalization, dynamic content, A/B testing, and deliverability tools. The email builder is functional but less polished than HubSpot's. Gets the job done without winning design awards.
Connected Campaigns link Pardot campaigns to Salesforce campaigns for unified reporting. B2B Marketing Analytics (additional cost) adds multi-touch attribution. Out-of-the-box reporting is limited; most teams export to a BI tool.
AI-powered lead scoring, behavior analysis, and campaign insights on Advanced tier and above. Einstein Score predicts which leads are most likely to convert. Useful but requires enough data volume to train the models effectively.
No tool is perfect. Here are the real trade-offs you should know about:
Pardot's interface feels dated. The email builder, the form editor, the reporting dashboards, none of it matches the polish of HubSpot or even newer Marketo updates. Your marketing team will notice, and it affects daily productivity and platform satisfaction. Salesforce has improved the UI incrementally but hasn't delivered the full redesign the product needs.
Pardot's native reporting is basic. Connected Campaigns help unify Pardot and Salesforce data, but building custom reports requires Salesforce report builder (limited for marketing use cases) or the B2B Marketing Analytics add-on (additional cost). Most serious teams end up exporting data to Tableau, Looker, or another BI tool for meaningful analysis.
Pardot only works with Salesforce CRM. If you ever migrate to HubSpot, Dynamics, or another CRM, you're also migrating off Pardot. This is fine if Salesforce is your long-term platform. It's a strategic risk if CRM migration is even a possibility.
Salesforce rebranding Pardot to 'Marketing Cloud Account Engagement' confused the market, documentation, and hiring. Job postings say Pardot. Salesforce documentation says MCAE. Support articles reference both names inconsistently. It's a branding problem, not a product problem, but it makes finding answers harder than it should be.
Pardot is the right choice when Salesforce CRM is your long-term platform and you want marketing automation that just works without sync issues. The native integration is Pardot's moat, and it's a deep one.
If a modern user experience matters to your marketing team, if native reporting flexibility is important, or if CRM migration is even a possibility, Pardot's trade-offs may not be worth the integration advantage.
| Tool | Starting Price | Strength | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpot Marketing Hub | From $800/mo (Enterprise) | Modern UX with CRM included and flexible reporting | Teams that want all-in-one marketing automation with an intuitive interface |
| Marketo (Adobe) | From $895/mo | Enterprise marketing automation with deeper scoring and analytics | Organizations needing multi-model scoring and complex automation beyond Pardot's capabilities |
| ActiveCampaign | From $49/mo | Affordable automation for smaller teams | SMBs that need solid marketing automation at a fraction of the enterprise price |
RevOps teams use Pardot for lead scoring, nurture automation, and campaign attribution, all natively inside Salesforce. The real value is operational: scoring and grading flow directly into Salesforce routing rules without middleware. Engagement Studio handles lifecycle nurturing with triggers that update CRM records automatically. Connected Campaigns link marketing touches to Salesforce campaigns for attribution. RevOps owns the scoring model, automation logic, and the data hygiene that keeps Pardot and Salesforce in sync, which is trivially easy since they're the same platform.
Yes, with caveats. The native Salesforce integration is Pardot's entire value proposition, and it's genuinely compelling. Zero sync failures, no duplicate record reconciliation, no middleware to troubleshoot. If you've ever lost a weekend debugging Marketo-Salesforce sync, Pardot eliminates that category of problems entirely. The caveats: the UI is dated, reporting requires a BI tool, and you're locked in permanently. But for most Salesforce shops running standard B2B marketing automation, Pardot's reliability outweighs its cosmetic shortcomings.
Pardot starts at $1,250/mo (Growth tier) for email, scoring, Engagement Studio, and 10K contacts. Most mid-market teams land on Plus at $2,750/mo for A/B testing, dynamic content, and Google Ads integration. Advanced is $4,400/mo and adds Einstein AI scoring. Premium is $15,000/mo for 75K contacts and dedicated IP. All tiers require Salesforce CRM licenses on top, so your real cost is Pardot plus Salesforce. Annual contracts only. Compare total stack cost against HubSpot's bundled CRM + Marketing Hub pricing.
The UI is a generation behind HubSpot. Your marketing team will notice and complain. Reporting is inflexible out of the box, and most teams end up exporting to Tableau or Looker for meaningful analysis. Einstein AI scoring requires the $4,400/mo tier, which is aggressive feature gating. The rebrand to 'Marketing Cloud Account Engagement' created documentation chaos that still persists. And the ecosystem lock-in is total: if you ever leave Salesforce, you're migrating Pardot too. That's two migrations, not one.
Pardot wins on Salesforce integration (native vs. connector), lead scoring simplicity, and predictable platform-fee pricing. HubSpot wins on UX, reporting flexibility, ease of use, and the all-in-one CRM+marketing bundle for teams without Salesforce. If Salesforce is your CRM and that's not changing, Pardot is the lower-maintenance choice. If you're evaluating CRM and marketing automation together, HubSpot's package deal is often cheaper and more modern. Don't compare them in isolation. Compare total stack cost and operational overhead.
Pardot is the default marketing automation choice for Salesforce-native organizations, and for good reason. The zero-sync integration eliminates an entire category of RevOps headaches that Marketo and HubSpot users deal with constantly. Lead scoring, Engagement Studio, and campaign data all live natively in Salesforce, which means less troubleshooting and more time spent on strategy. The trade-offs are real: dated UI, limited reporting, full ecosystem lock-in, and a confusing rebrand that nobody adopted. For RevOps teams on Salesforce who want reliable marketing automation without integration drama, Pardot delivers. Just budget for a BI tool and manage your marketing team's UX expectations.
But know the trade-offs:
The RevOps Report delivers honest assessments of GTM tools from a practitioner perspective.
Subscribe to The RevOps Report Browse All Tool Reviews