

This is the CRM comparison. Every B2B ops team has either made this decision, is about to make it, or is living with the consequences of making it wrong. Salesforce gives you infinite flexibility and a brutal learning curve. HubSpot gives you a unified platform that works out of the box but hits walls when your data model gets complex. For RevOps, the choice is really about how much customization you need versus how much admin overhead you can absorb.
| Factor | Salesforce | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $25-300/user/mo + add-ons Costs compound fast | Free CRM; paid from $20/user/mo to $150+/user/mo |
| Best For | Enterprise, complex sales motions, heavy customization | SMB to mid-market, unified marketing + sales + service |
| Data Model | Custom objects, unlimited fields, relationships Infinitely flexible | Standard objects with custom properties Limits at scale |
| Admin Requirement | Dedicated admin required Non-negotiable | Part-time admin sufficient for most orgs Lower overhead |
| Ecosystem | AppExchange: 7,000+ apps Largest | App Marketplace: 1,500+ apps |
| Marketing Automation | Requires Pardot/MCAE ($1,250+/mo extra) | Built-in Marketing Hub Unified |
| Implementation | 3-6 months typical Long | 2-6 weeks typical Fast |
| Total Cost (50 users, 3 years) | $500K-$1.2M+ (licenses + admin + SI) Expensive | $150K-$400K Lower TCO |
| Feature | Salesforce | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Custom Objects | Unlimited, full relationship modeling Best in class | Available on Enterprise+ but less flexible |
| Workflow Automation | Flow Builder: complex multi-object logic More powerful | Workflows: simpler but covers 80% of use cases |
| Reporting | Custom report types, cross-object, dashboards Deepest | Good dashboards, custom reports on Enterprise+ |
| Attribution | Campaigns + custom attribution models | Built-in multi-touch attribution Easier to set up |
| Lead Routing | Assignment rules + ecosystem (LeanData, etc.) More options | Basic rotation, Operations Hub for advanced |
| Operations Hub | N/A (use Apex, Flow, or third-party tools) | Data sync, programmable automation, data quality RevOps-specific |
| API Access | Comprehensive REST + SOAP + Bulk Enterprise-grade | Good REST API, rate limits on lower tiers |
Running both is more common than you think. Some orgs use HubSpot for marketing automation and Salesforce as the system of record for sales. This works if you invest in the bidirectional sync (HubSpot-Salesforce connector is mature but not flawless). If you outgrow HubSpot, migrating to Salesforce is painful but well-documented. The reverse migration (Salesforce to HubSpot) is harder because you are usually losing data model complexity.
| Use Case | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Complex enterprise sales | Salesforce | Custom objects, CPQ, multi-currency, and advanced automation |
| Unified marketing + sales platform | HubSpot | Native marketing automation without bolting on Pardot |
| Lean ops team | HubSpot | Lower admin overhead, faster deployment, self-serve configuration |
| Advanced reporting | Salesforce | Cross-object reports, custom report types, Einstein Analytics |
| Budget under $100K/year | HubSpot | Lower TCO including admin, implementation, and license costs |
| Custom data model | Salesforce | Unlimited custom objects and relationship types |
Salesforce is the more powerful CRM. Full stop. But power without the people to wield it is just expensive shelfware. If you have dedicated ops headcount, complex sales motions, and the budget for a 3-6 month implementation, Salesforce gives you a platform you will never outgrow. If your team is lean, your sales motion is straightforward, and you want marketing and sales unified without stitching together three products, HubSpot delivers 80% of the capability at 40% of the total cost. The worst decision is choosing Salesforce and then under-investing in the admin and configuration it demands.
Tool reviews, salary benchmarks, and stack recommendations for RevOps leaders.
Subscribe Free