COMPARISON
Salesloft
VS
Apollo

Salesloft vs Apollo: Sales Engagement Compared for RevOps

Salesloft is the enterprise sales engagement platform, now with Clari forecasting baked in after the 2025 acquisition. Apollo is the all-in-one challenger that bundles data, sequences, a dialer, and a CRM-lite at a fraction of the cost. For RevOps, this comparison forces a familiar question: pay more for an enterprise-grade tool with coaching and governance, or pay less for a platform that covers 80% of the use cases and includes data for free?

!
Quick Verdict: Salesloft wins on engagement governance, coaching features, call recording, and the Clari forecasting integration. Apollo wins on total cost, built-in data, and time-to-value. If your sales org needs manager coaching tools, rep performance analytics, and enterprise-grade sequence governance, Salesloft justifies the premium. If you need data plus engagement in one tool and your reps do not need hand-holding, Apollo delivers dramatically better value per dollar.

Salesloft vs Apollo at a Glance

FactorSalesloftApollo
Pricing$75-175/user/mo Annual typicalFree tier; $49/user/mo paid Much cheaper
Best ForEnterprise engagement with coaching and forecastingAll-in-one prospecting + engagement at lower cost
Contact DatabaseNot included (requires separate data tool)275M+ contacts included Bundled
Coaching FeaturesCall recording, scorecards, Rhythm AI StrongBasic call recording, no coaching scorecards
ForecastingClari-powered (post-acquisition) IntegratedBasic deal tracking only
CRM IntegrationDeep Salesforce and HubSpot sync Enterprise-gradeNative SF/HS sync, less granular
G2 Ease of Setup8.6/10 Fast for enterprise9.1/10 Fastest
Total Stack CostSalesloft + data tool = $175-375/user/mo$49-99/user/mo all-in 3-5x cheaper

Detailed Feature Comparison

FeatureSalesloftApollo
Email SequencesMulti-step with templates and governance More governedMulti-step with A/B testing
Built-in DataNone; requires ZoomInfo, Clay, etc.275M+ contacts with enrichment Included
Call RecordingBuilt-in with coaching analytics SuperiorBasic recording, no coaching layer
Rhythm AIPrioritizes tasks based on buyer signals UniqueStandard task queue
Revenue ForecastingClari integration included Unique post-mergerNot available
Manager DashboardsRep activity, performance, and pipeline views More detailedBasic team activity dashboard
AI Email WriterAvailableAvailable with account scoring context

When to Use Which

Choose Salesloft When

  • Your sales managers need coaching tools: call recordings, scorecards, talk-to-listen ratios, and rep performance benchmarks
  • The Clari forecasting integration is valuable because you want engagement and forecasting in one vendor relationship
  • Sequence governance matters and you need approval workflows, send limits, and template locking to maintain quality
  • You already have a data provider (ZoomInfo, Clay) and need a dedicated engagement platform, not another data tool
  • Enterprise features like advanced permissions, team hierarchies, and compliance controls are requirements

Choose Apollo When

  • You want to eliminate the cost of a separate data provider by using Apollo built-in 275M+ contact database
  • Budget is the primary constraint and $49/user/mo all-in beats $175+/user/mo for Salesloft plus data
  • Your team needs to be self-sufficient: find contacts, enrich them, and run sequences from one interface
  • Coaching and forecasting features are nice-to-haves, not requirements (your managers coach without software)
  • Speed to productivity matters more than enterprise governance; you want reps sending in days, not weeks

When to Consider Both or Neither

Running both is redundant for engagement. Some teams use Apollo for data prospecting and Salesloft for structured engagement, pushing qualified contacts from Apollo to Salesloft for sequence enrollment. This works but adds cost and data sync complexity. If neither fits, Outreach offers comparable enterprise features to Salesloft, and Reply.io at $60/user/mo covers mid-market multi-channel needs.

What This Means for Your Stack

RevOps-Specific Considerations

  • Total stack cost is the critical calculation. Salesloft at $125/user/mo plus ZoomInfo at $100/user/mo equivalent equals $225/user/mo. Apollo at $49/user/mo replaces both. For a 30-person sales team, that is $17,640/year (Apollo) versus $81,000/year (Salesloft + ZoomInfo). The 4.5x gap is not trivial.
  • The Clari-Salesloft merger changes the value proposition. If you were evaluating Clari separately ($100-310/user/mo), getting forecasting capabilities bundled into Salesloft could justify the premium over Apollo. Ask about forecasting feature availability on your specific Salesloft tier.
  • Coaching ROI is measurable but often goes unused. Salesloft call recording and coaching features are genuinely good. They are also genuinely unused in many orgs where managers do not have the time or discipline to review calls systematically. Be honest about whether your managers will actually use coaching tools before paying for them.
  • CRM sync granularity favors Salesloft for complex Salesforce setups. Field mapping, activity logging, and sync rules are more configurable. Apollo sync is functional but less precise for orgs with custom objects and complex record types.
  • Apollo data quality is the trade-off. The included database is good but not as accurate as ZoomInfo for enterprise contacts. If you switch from Salesloft + ZoomInfo to Apollo alone, expect slightly lower data accuracy for enterprise ICP segments. Test with your specific target accounts.

Winner by Use Case

Use CaseWinnerWhy
Sales coachingSalesloftCall recording, scorecards, and manager analytics
All-in-one data + engagementApolloContact database included at no extra cost
Revenue forecasting integrationSalesloftClari-powered forecasting post-merger
Budget efficiencyApollo3-5x lower total stack cost
Enterprise governanceSalesloftApproval workflows, permissions, compliance controls
Fastest time-to-valueApolloSelf-serve deployment in days with data included

The RevOps Report's Bottom Line

Salesloft is the enterprise engagement platform for teams that invest in coaching, governance, and now forecasting (via Clari). Apollo is the value play for teams that need data and engagement in one tool without the enterprise overhead. The math is straightforward: if Salesloft coaching and forecasting features deliver measurable rep performance improvement and forecast accuracy, the premium is justified. If your team just needs to find contacts and email them effectively, Apollo does that at 3-5x lower total cost. Do not pay for coaching features your managers will not use.

Get Weekly RevOps Intelligence

Tool reviews, salary benchmarks, and stack recommendations for RevOps leaders.

Subscribe Free
Disclosure: The RevOps Report may receive affiliate compensation from tools mentioned here. Our analysis is independent. Every claim is based on publicly available data and user feedback.
Last Updated: January 2026