COMPARISON

ZoomInfo vs Apollo: Sales Data Compared for RevOps

ZoomInfo is the incumbent data provider with enterprise-grade coverage and enterprise-grade pricing. Apollo is the challenger that bundles data with a built-in engagement platform at a fraction of the cost. For RevOps, the comparison is about data accuracy versus total cost of ownership, and whether you need a specialized data provider or an all-in-one platform.

Quick Verdict: ZoomInfo has better data quality and coverage for enterprise and mid-market contacts, but costs $15K-$100K+ annually and locks you into rigid contracts. Apollo provides 80% of the data at 20% of the cost and includes engagement tools ZoomInfo charges extra for. If data accuracy for enterprise accounts is mission-critical, ZoomInfo justifies the premium. For everyone else, Apollo delivers better value per dollar.

Quick Comparison

ZoomInfo vs Apollo at a Glance

Factor	ZoomInfo	Apollo
Pricing	$15K-$100K+/year Opaque pricing	Free tier; paid from $49/user/mo Transparent
Best For	Enterprise data accuracy at scale	SMB/mid-market data + engagement
Database Size	321M+ professional profiles Largest	275M+ contacts
Email Accuracy	~95% verified Higher	~85-90% verified
Phone Data	Direct dials, mobile verified Superior	Mobile numbers, less verification
Built-in SEP	Engage add-on (extra cost)	Included Bundled
CRM Integration	Enterprise-grade SF/HS sync Deepest	Native SF/HS sync, less granular
Contract Flexibility	Annual, hard to exit Rigid	Monthly available Flexible

Feature Breakdown

Detailed Feature Comparison

Feature	ZoomInfo	Apollo
Contact Data Accuracy	Industry-leading verification Best	Good but lower verification rate
Intent Data	Bidstream + research intent Deeper	Basic buyer intent signals
Technographics	Detailed tech stack tracking Comprehensive	Basic technology filters
Org Charts	Available on enterprise plans	Not available
Email Sequences	Via Engage add-on ($)	Built-in at no extra cost Included
Dialer	Via Engage add-on ($)	Built-in Included
Credit System	Complex credit tiers Hard to predict	Simpler per-user model

Decision Framework

When to Use Which

Choose ZoomInfo When

Data accuracy for enterprise accounts is a hard requirement (verified direct dials, validated emails at 95%+)
You need intent data, technographics, and org charts for account-based selling
Your budget supports $15K+ annually and you can negotiate terms effectively
Your sales motion targets large enterprises where contact data quality directly impacts conversion
CRM integration needs are complex (custom objects, field-level sync rules, real-time updates)

Choose Apollo When

Budget is constrained and you need data plus engagement tools in one platform
Your ICP includes SMB and mid-market where Apollo data quality is competitive with ZoomInfo
You want to start free or at $49/user/mo and scale up based on results
Built-in sequences and dialer eliminate the need for a separate SEP purchase
Contract flexibility matters and you do not want to be locked into annual terms

When to Consider Both or Neither

Some teams use ZoomInfo for enterprise accounts (where data quality premium matters) and Apollo for mid-market and SMB prospecting (where cost efficiency matters). This split-approach works if you have the ops bandwidth to manage two data sources and reconcile them in your CRM. If neither is sufficient, Clay waterfall enrichment across multiple providers often delivers better combined coverage.

RevOps Perspective

What This Means for Your Stack

RevOps-Specific Considerations

ZoomInfo contract negotiations are notoriously difficult. Auto-renewal clauses, credit expirations, and opaque pricing mean you need to manage the vendor relationship actively. Use Vendr benchmarking to know what fair pricing looks like before negotiating.
Apollo data quality drops off for certain segments (international contacts, niche industries, C-suite at large enterprises). Run an accuracy audit on your specific ICP before committing. Export 200 records and verify manually.
CRM data contamination risk is real with both tools. Bulk imports from either platform can create thousands of duplicate records if your dedup rules are not airtight. Test with small batches first.
ZoomInfo Engage creates a second engagement platform alongside your existing SEP. If you already use Outreach or Salesloft, adding ZoomInfo Engage duplicates functionality and fragments reporting.
Apollo free tier is genuinely useful for small teams but has aggressive upsell within the product. The email credit limits and feature gates push teams toward paid plans faster than expected.

Summary

Winner by Use Case

Use Case	Winner	Why
Enterprise data accuracy	ZoomInfo	Higher verification rates, better enterprise coverage
Budget efficiency	Apollo	80% of the data at 20% of the cost
All-in-one platform	Apollo	Data + sequences + dialer included
Intent and technographics	ZoomInfo	Deeper signal data for ABM motions
SMB/mid-market prospecting	Apollo	Competitive data quality at much lower cost
CRM integration depth	ZoomInfo	More granular sync options for complex CRM setups

The RevOps Report's Bottom Line

ZoomInfo is the premium data provider that justifies its cost for enterprise sales teams where contact accuracy directly affects revenue. Apollo is the value play that bundles good-enough data with built-in engagement tools at a fraction of the price. For RevOps, the math is clear: if 5% better data accuracy translates to enough additional revenue to cover the price premium, ZoomInfo is worth it. For most mid-market teams, Apollo delivers sufficient data quality with engagement tools included, making the total stack cost dramatically lower. Either way, invest in CRM dedup rules before importing records from either platform.

Get Weekly RevOps Intelligence

Tool reviews, salary benchmarks, and stack recommendations for RevOps leaders.

Subscribe Free

Disclosure: The RevOps Report may receive affiliate compensation from tools mentioned here. Our analysis is independent. Every claim is based on publicly available data and user feedback.

Last Updated: January 2026